Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nominees Supreme Court"
From Phyllis Schlafly Eagles
(Gorsuch) |
(→Neil Gorsuch: Kastl) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Neil Gorsuch== | ==Neil Gorsuch== | ||
| − | He "is an extreme supporter of stare decisis"? Actually, in the very case cited, ''United States v. Games-Perez'', [http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/11/11-1011.pdf he urged] the ''en banc'' court to overturn the precedent in question.[[User:Andrew|Andrew]] ([[User talk:Andrew|talk]]) 22:26, 25 January 2017 (EST) | + | *He "is an extreme supporter of stare decisis"? Actually, in the very case cited, ''United States v. Games-Perez'', [http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/11/11-1011.pdf he urged] the ''en banc'' court to overturn the precedent in question.[[User:Andrew|Andrew]] ([[User talk:Andrew|talk]]) 22:26, 25 January 2017 (EST) |
| + | |||
| + | *He "sided with civil rights for 'gender identity' in 2009"? In that very case, [http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2009/04/14/06-16907.pdf he completely rejected the lawsuit] brought by a transgender person. He did mention a prior case that had said "transgender individuals may state viable sex discrimination claims...." but there was no point in challenging that precedent since the plaintiff lost regardless of the precedent's validity.[[User:Andrew|Andrew]] ([[User talk:Andrew|talk]]) 23:11, 25 January 2017 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 00:11, 26 January 2017
Thomas Hardiman
He "lacks a powerful sponsor"? Not exactly. According to Quin Hillyer, "Trump’s sister, Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, serves on the same circuit court as Hardiman and reportedly has recommended him quite highly to her brother. Personal connections matter a great deal to Trump."Andrew (talk) 22:15, 25 January 2017 (EST)
Neil Gorsuch
- He "is an extreme supporter of stare decisis"? Actually, in the very case cited, United States v. Games-Perez, he urged the en banc court to overturn the precedent in question.Andrew (talk) 22:26, 25 January 2017 (EST)
- He "sided with civil rights for 'gender identity' in 2009"? In that very case, he completely rejected the lawsuit brought by a transgender person. He did mention a prior case that had said "transgender individuals may state viable sex discrimination claims...." but there was no point in challenging that precedent since the plaintiff lost regardless of the precedent's validity.Andrew (talk) 23:11, 25 January 2017 (EST)
