Difference between revisions of "Best arguments 2017"
From Phyllis Schlafly Eagles
(Created page with "Here are several of the best arguments against a Convention of States: *a vote for a Convention of States would be a vote against the conservative Republican platform, which...") |
(fiscal note needed) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Here are several of the best arguments against a Convention of States: | + | Here are several of the best arguments against a Convention of States, to defeat the enemies of the Constitution who seek a constitutional convention to change it: |
| − | *a vote for a Convention of States would be a vote against the conservative Republican platform, which rejected this. | + | *require a fiscal note, which is billions of dollars in lost entitlements to states |
| + | *Justice Scalia called this proposal for an Article V convention a "horrible idea" at a public event less than a year before he passed away. | ||
| + | *Phyllis Schlafly completely opposed a Con Con and Convention of States, and all variations on the concept. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *a vote for a Convention of States would be a vote against the conservative Republican national platform, which emphatically rejected this. | ||
*a vote for a Convention of States would enable liberals to repeal the Electoral College. | *a vote for a Convention of States would enable liberals to repeal the Electoral College. | ||
*a vote for a Convention of States would open the door to repealing the Second Amendment. | *a vote for a Convention of States would open the door to repealing the Second Amendment. | ||
*a vote for a Convention of States would facilitate a new constitutional right to taxpayer-funded abortion. | *a vote for a Convention of States would facilitate a new constitutional right to taxpayer-funded abortion. | ||
| − | *only Congress calls an Article V convention, and | + | *only Congress calls an Article V convention, and states should not be giving Congress more power. |
| − | + | ||
*even supporters of a Convention of States have admitted that a a runaway convention could result. | *even supporters of a Convention of States have admitted that a a runaway convention could result. | ||
*supporters of a Convention of States hide the secret agenda of their donors. | *supporters of a Convention of States hide the secret agenda of their donors. | ||
[[category:ConCon]] | [[category:ConCon]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:32, 25 December 2016
Here are several of the best arguments against a Convention of States, to defeat the enemies of the Constitution who seek a constitutional convention to change it:
- require a fiscal note, which is billions of dollars in lost entitlements to states
- Justice Scalia called this proposal for an Article V convention a "horrible idea" at a public event less than a year before he passed away.
- Phyllis Schlafly completely opposed a Con Con and Convention of States, and all variations on the concept.
- a vote for a Convention of States would be a vote against the conservative Republican national platform, which emphatically rejected this.
- a vote for a Convention of States would enable liberals to repeal the Electoral College.
- a vote for a Convention of States would open the door to repealing the Second Amendment.
- a vote for a Convention of States would facilitate a new constitutional right to taxpayer-funded abortion.
- only Congress calls an Article V convention, and states should not be giving Congress more power.
- even supporters of a Convention of States have admitted that a a runaway convention could result.
- supporters of a Convention of States hide the secret agenda of their donors.
